🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a increasing group of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that smartphones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". The policy could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to enact a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is provided. Although it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a useful starting point," commented one MEP driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on robust data".

Last year, momentum built behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. An organization founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, action is largely occurring at the local government level amid federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating guardian approval for minors to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from certain politicians to copy the Australian path, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of these regions, other nations are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations adopt a more measured stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

While this global conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly willing to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.